North Dakota still dominates in terms of the percent of total jobs that can be explained by regional competitiveness. Texas is still No. 2. Nevada is still last. After that, our new analysis based on shift share diverts from our previous analysis.
Apr. 3, 2013 | Posted by Joshua WrightPosts Tagged ‘shift share’
America’s Most Competitive Metros Since 2010
Which metros are becoming more competitive (that is, gaining a larger share of total job creation) and which are losing their share of the jobs being created. We take a look using shift-share analysis.
Nov. 7, 2012 | Posted by Joshua WrightInfographic: America’s Most Competitive Metros
For background and details on this infographic, check out our original post. Read more about EMSI data here and shift share here. Note: The percentage shown for each metro is the share of total 2012 jobs that are due to growing (or declining) competitiveness from 2010-2012.
Nov. 7, 2012 | Posted by Joshua WrightInteractive Graphic: Ranking States By Competitiveness
We teamed up with our friends at Tableau Software to produce an interactive graphic that details individual industries that are driving states to be more (or less) competitive.
Jan. 17, 2012 | Posted by Rob SentzWhich States Are Growing More Competitive?
EMSI produced a side-by-side analysis of every state to see which states are becoming more competitive (that is, gaining a larger share of the total job creation), and which are losing their share of the jobs being created.
Dec. 6, 2011 | Posted by Rob SentzUnderstanding Shift Share
Shift share is a standard regional analysis method that attempts to determine how much of regional job growth can be attributed to national trends and how much is due to unique regional factors. Shift share helps answer why employment is growing or declining in a regional industry, cluster, or occupation.
Dec. 5, 2011 | Posted by Rob SentzInfographic: Which States Are Growing More Competitive?
EMSI produced a side-by-side analysis of every state to show how they stack up against each other. The goal is to see which states are becoming more competitive (that is, gaining a larger share of the total jobs being created), and which are becoming less competitive.
Dec. 5, 2011 | Posted by Joshua Wright
